COP30 Presidency Calls For Initiatives to Promote Information Integrity Amid Rampant Climate Disinformation


The first-ever UN Global Risk Report released this month also named mis- and disinformation the world’s top vulnerability, while environmental risks represent five of the top 10 most important risks across all regions.
The COP30 presidency’s initiative, which brings together the UN, UNESCO, UNFCCC, Brazil, and six other countries – Chile, Denmark, France, Morocco, the United Kingdom, and Sweden – along with civil society partners – represents the first time the issue of information integrity has been included in the COP Action Agenda.
At the G20 Leaders’ Summit where the initiative was launched, UN Secretary-General António Guterres called for strengthening action against “coordinated disinformation campaigns impeding global progress on climate change, ranging from outright denial to greenwashing to harassment of climate scientists.”
Last year, the UN chief called on countries to ban fossil fuel advertising in the same way they restricted tobacco.
“Many in the fossil fuel industry have shamelessly greenwashed, even as they have sought to delay climate action – with lobbying, legal threats, and massive ad campaigns. They have been aided and abetted by advertising and PR companies – Mad Men fueling the madness,” Guterres said.
Public confusion also directly impacts how governments regulate greenhouse gas emissions and support solutions. “Worldwide, there are influential people who keep denying that the world is facing climate threats, which has slowed down the implementation of policy measures and actions that can tackle the climate crisis for humankind,” Edwin Lau, founder of The Green Earth, told Earth.Org in an emailed response.
The call-to-action – “mutirão”, Portuguese for “joint effort” – seeks existing actions in areas including:
- Research on disinformation and other threats to climate information integrity
- Tools and methods to promote climate information integrity
- Communication strategies and campaigns
- Support for environmental journalism
- Protecting scientific data and data sets related to climate change
- Transparency in the advertising supply chain
- Media, information and digital literacy related to climate change
COP30 will take place in Belém, Brazil, from November 10 to 21, 2025. Interested organizations can access the application form until August 31, 2025.
Finding the Right Communication Approach
Experts are divided as to what types of initiatives will be most effective.
In an email to Earth.Org, podcaster Michael Gold of Climate Swings predicted, “Inspiring, uplifting stories about people doing awesome things are always going to land better than wonky scientific explanations or doom-and-gloom narratives about the end of the world.” This is an approach popularized by climate optimists like Anne Therese Gennari, author of The Climate Optimist Handbook, and Abby Hopper, CEO of Solar Energy Industries Association.
However, according to a 2024 report from the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), fundamental facts are even more important. According to this analysis, climate deniers on mega platforms such as YouTube have recently moved from an older approach of denying global warming and its causes to a “new denial” where they claim that climate solutions will not work and that climate science and the climate movement are themselves unreliable.
In a speech earlier this year, CCDH’s CEO Imran Ahmed said, “The climate crisis isn’t just a scientific or political issue, it’s a communications issue. If lies spread unchecked, actions will stall.”
More on the topic: YouTube Makes up to $13.4 Million a Year From Videos Containing Climate Denial Narratives that Undermine Green Solutions, Watchdog Says
Likewise, INTOSAI, the working group on environmental auditing, has highlighted the need for “Supreme Audit Institutions” to present data-driven insights and clear, evidence-based analysis to counter denialist claims.
Effective solutions are likely to require both of these approaches, reflecting the multiple, aggressive strategies of denialism and conspiracy theorists. In a LinkedIn post this week, renowned climate scientist Katherine Hayhoe noted that most climate denial falls into one of five general categories: it’s not real; it’s not us; it’s not bad; we can’t fix it; it’s too late.
Existing actions around climate information integrity include support for climate journalism, academic initiatives such as the Yale Program on Climate Communication, and meta-analyses on climate change information. Along with this, an increasing number of programs such as the Hollywood Climate Summit and the Climate Fiction Writers League also support the inclusion of climate information in popular film and fiction.
Featured image: Mark Dixon/Flickr.
Leave a Reply