13:46:22 From Bill Pugsley to Everyone: Question: What implications are there in this section of the Environment Minister’s Mandate letter https://pm.gc.ca/en/mandate-letters/2021/12/16/minister-environment-and-climate-change-mandate-letter “Recognize the “right to a healthy environment” in federal law and introduce legislation to require the development of an environmental justice strategy and the examination of the link between race, socio-economic status and exposure to environmental risk.” 14:12:46 From Dave Dougherty to Everyone: How might joint and several liability pertain to causation? 14:14:57 From Vic Buxton to Everyone: I have a question regarding the legal rights of civil servants that are accused of hurting business interests by offering anticipated environment measures to the public. I was under such a situation for many years. 14:15:46 From Geoff Strong to Everyone: Could an organization take the federal govt to court because it used 'deception' in its climate plan? Specifically promising 40% reduction in Canadian emissions when it means only "from federal facilities and conventional fleets." 14:16:30 From John Hollins to Everyone: Since Greta emerged on the scene, combined with awareness of extreme weather, how if at all would the greater public/political awareness trickle into the legal system? 14:21:00 From John Meyer (MAyer) to Everyone: Case of provincial and federal governments forcing growth down the throat of local governments without any environmental assessment. Both environmental analysis and democratic processes are completely evaded. 14:31:35 From Bruce Fanjoy to Everyone: How much legal weight do rulings outside of Canada have on Canadian courts? 14:31:58 From Dave Dougherty to Everyone: For future laws and amendments, could justiciability be specifically included in the text? 14:34:41 From Meg Sears to Everyone: Last Parliament, C-28 (CEPA amendments) had Right to a Healthy Environment in the preamble. Would this be sufficient or should it be in the legislation itself? What would that look like? 14:35:04 From Geoff Strong to Everyone: How can CEPA (etc.) list CO2 as a toxic substance when it is essential to life on Earth? For photosynthesis and for helping maintain the climate at a reasonable level (in the absence of excess human emissions). 14:36:18 From Peter Meincke to Everyone: Could the govt be sued for subsidizing fossil fuels? 14:41:55 From Ted Manning to Everyone: Can class action suits work. What factors are important if success is to be possible? When I was with Environment Canada, there was a writ of mandamus brought against an ADM for pollution caused by EC/government factilities. 15:06:19 From Dave Dougherty to Everyone: People breathe out carbon dioxide...because it is toxic in the body. Clearly, carbon dioxide can be a pollutant. It can, in fact, make you sick and even kill you. That is aside from effects on the climate. 15:08:26 From Bill Blann to Everyone: It is all in the concentration of the material. CO2 is just part of our natural equilibria that have to be maintained in balance. It’s not completely eliminated. 15:14:13 From Meg Sears to Everyone: Our group has put some thought into aspects of the science that would operationalize a Right to a Healthy Environment in CEPA. We have an editable summary letter that will be sent to ministers and critics of health and environment...for your consideration. https://preventcancernow.ca/update-and-strengthen-canadas-key-chemicals-laws/ 15:17:12 From Dave Dougherty to Everyone: https://publicdomainvectors.org/en/free-clipart/Carbon-dioxide-toxicity-chart/81829.html 15:20:32 From Dave Dougherty to Everyone: https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media_file/2020-08/Carbon-Dioxide.pdf 15:20:46 From John Hollins to Everyone: All things are poisons, for there is nothing without poisonous qualities. It is only the dose which makes a thing a poison. Paracelsus, 16th Century Swiss physician and philosopher. [Paracelsus was also an alchemist and was referring to food when he expounded on the dose amking the posion. Ed.]